Assessing worker attitudes under a two-tier wage plan.
This study examines data from a 1985 survey of employee attitudes at an airline that had introduced a merging (or temporary) two-tier pay plan the year before. The authors find, contrary to popular wisdom, that lower-wage `B' tier workers felt significantly more satisfied with their pay, work, and supervision, more optimistic about future pay, more confident of their job security, and more committed to the company and union than `A' tier workers. The authors suggest that `B' tier workers have lower expectations than `A' tier workers, partly because of their self-selection into jobs with reduced starting wages and partly because of the reference groups with which they evaluate their situations, which differ from `A' tier workers' reference groups. (Abstract courtesy JSTOR.)
Year of publication: |
1990
|
---|---|
Authors: | Cappelli, Peter ; Sherer, Peter D. |
Published in: |
Industrial and Labor Relations Review. - School of Industrial & Labor Relations, ISSN 0019-7939. - Vol. 43.1990, 2, p. 225-244
|
Publisher: |
School of Industrial & Labor Relations |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Spanning the union-nonunion boundary
Cappelli, Peter, (1989)
-
Assessing worker attitudes under a two-tier wage plan
Cappelli, Peter, (1990)
-
Industrial restructuring and industrial relations in three United States firms
Sherer, Peter D., (1991)
- More ...