Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy
One can be independent, or one can be subject to decisions made by others. This paper argues that this difference, embodied in the institutional distinction between the decision-making procedures 'market' and 'hierarchy', affects individual wellbeing beyond outcomes. Taking self-employment as an important case of independence, it is shown that the self-employed derive higher satisfaction from work than those employed in organizations, irrespective of income gained or hours worked. This is evidence for procedural utility: people value not only outcomes, but also the processes leading to outcomes. Copyright (c) The London School of Economics and Political Science 2007.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | BENZ, MATTHIAS ; FREY, BRUNO S. |
Published in: |
Economica. - London School of Economics (LSE). - Vol. 75.2008, 298, p. 362-383
|
Publisher: |
London School of Economics (LSE) |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Value of Autonomy : Evidence from the Self-Employed in 23 Countries
Benz, Matthias, (2003)
-
Corporate Governance: What can we Learn From Public Governance?
Benz, Matthias, (2005)
-
Being Independent is a Great Thing:Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy
Frey, Bruno S., (2003)
- More ...