Best approach to impact assessment is to use empirically based or simulation models to forecast impacts. Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 1538. [Concerning the impact at power plants on fish populations]
This paper advocates the utility of mathematical models, as contrasted with statistical procedures and processional judgment, for assessing environmental impacts. While it would be desirable to use statistical tests to detect and estimate impacts, this is generally difficult or impossible to do, even with existing sources of impact. Empirical modeling, supported by statistical analyses when possible, is proffered as the logical alternative. Next, for purposes of forecasting impacts, the use of models as opposed to professional judgment or experience is considered. The conclusion is reached that, while models cannot answer all of the relevant questions, they can be used effectively and can address problems that are beyond the reach of statistical methods.
Year of publication: |
2008-08-28
|
---|---|
Authors: | Christensen, S.W. |
Subject: | fossil-fueled power plants | environmental sciences | ENTRAINMENT | ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS | IMPINGEMENT | MEASURING METHODS | COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS | FISHES | FORECASTING | MATHEMATICAL MODELS | POWER PLANTS | STOCHASTIC PROCESSES | ANIMALS | AQUATIC ORGANISMS | VERTEBRATES |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Kneese, Allen V., (2008)
-
Kneese, Allen V., (2008)
-
Effects of the drought on California electricity supply and demand
Benenson, P., (2010)
- More ...