Best Foot Forward or Best for Last in a Sequential Auction?
Should a seller with private information sell the best or worst goods first? Considering the sequential auction of two stochastically equivalent goods, we find that the seller has an incentive to impress buyers by selling the better good first because the seller's sequencing strategy endogenously generates correlation in the values of the goods across periods. When this impression effect is strong enough, selling the better good first is the unique pure-strategy equilibrium. By credibly revealing to all buyers the seller's ranking of the goods, an equilibrium strategy of sequencing the goods reduces buyer information rents and increases expected revenues in accordance with the linkage principle.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Chakraborty, Archishman ; Gupta, Nandini ; Harbaugh, Rick |
Published in: |
RAND Journal of Economics. - The RAND Corporation, ISSN 0741-6261. - Vol. 37.2006, 1, p. 176-194
|
Publisher: |
The RAND Corporation |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Ordinal cheap talk in common value auctions
Chakraborty, Archishman, (2002)
-
Best Foot Forward or Best for Last in a Sequential Auction?
Chakraborty, Archishman, (2000)
-
Best Foot Forward or Best for Last in a Sequential Auction?
Chakraborty, Archishman, (2004)
- More ...