Beyond Self-Reports: Changes in Biomarkers as Predictors of Mortality
type="main"> <p>The proliferation of biosocial surveys has increased the importance of weighing the costs and benefits of adding biomarker collection to population-based surveys. A crucial question is whether biomarkers offer incremental value beyond self-reported measures, which are easier to collect and impose less respondent burden. We use longitudinal data from a nationally representative sample of older Taiwanese (aged 54+ in 2000, examined in 2000 and 2006 with mortality follow-up through 2011) to address that question with respect to predicting all-cause mortality. A summary measure of biomarkers improves mortality prediction (as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) compared with self-reports alone, but individual biomarkers perform better than the summary score. We find that incorporating change in biomarkers over a six-year period yields a small improvement in mortality prediction compared with one-time measurement. But, is the incremental value worth the costs?
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Glei, Dana A. ; Goldman, Noreen ; Rodríguez, Germán ; Weinstein, Maxine |
Published in: |
Population and Development Review. - The Population Council, Inc., ISSN 0098-7921. - Vol. 40.2014, 2, p. 331-360
|
Publisher: |
The Population Council, Inc. |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter?
Glei, Dana A., (2003)
-
Cornman, Jennifer C., (2011)
-
Perception has its Own Reality : Subjective versus Objective Measures of Economic Distress
Glei, Dana A., (2018)
- More ...