Biased probability judgment: evidence of incidence and relationship to economic outcomes from a representative sample
Many economic decisions involve a substantial amount of uncertainty, and therefore crucially depend on how individuals process probabilistic information. In this paper, we investigate the capability for probability judgment in a representative sample of the German population. Our results show that almost a third of the respondents exhibits systematically biased perceptions of probability. The findings also indicate that the observed biases are related to individual economic outcomes, which suggests potential policy relevance of our findings.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dohmen, Thomas ; Falk, Armin ; Huffman, David ; Marklein, Felix ; Sunde, Uwe |
Publisher: |
Bonn : Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |
Subject: | Beschränkte Rationalität | Entscheidung bei Unsicherheit | Test | Langzeitarbeitslosigkeit | Konsumentenverhalten | Deutschland | Bounded rationality | probability judgment | gambler's fallacy | hot hand fallacy | representative design | long-term unemployment | financial decision making |
Saved in:
freely available
Series: | IZA Discussion Papers ; 4170 |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | 601845994 [GVK] hdl:10419/35424 [Handle] |
Classification: | C90 - Design of Experiments. General ; D00 - Microeconomics. General ; D10 - Household Behavior and Family Economics. General ; D80 - Information and Uncertainty. General ; D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty ; H00 - Public Economics. General |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010269033