Biotechnology, Biosafety and Impact Assessment: Field Trials of Transgenic Crops in Developing Countries

The deliberate release of transgenic crops is often taken to be an indicator of agricultural biotechnology development. However, less than 10% of the field trials world wide have been carried out in Developing Countries (DCs) and it seems that more than 80% of these were carried out by multinational companies to speed up seed production in the counter season or to test transgenic crops under special environmental conditions. The DCs differ widely in their legal, religious, political and social system as well as in issues such as educational standards, agronomic tradition and national income. Generally, these countries have not evolved an appropriate biotechnology market structure, hindering the development of an "indigenous" biotechnology capacity, a prerequisite for establishing and translating Biosafety Guidelines within a legally binding system. Several countries in the developing world, although highly interested in establishing agrobiotechnology capacities, have neither developed a national or regional programme nor guidelines for the safe use of modern biotechnology tools. An overview on the actual situation is given. The release of transgenic plants in DCs is, despite its implications for trade agreements, intellectual property rights and a Biosafety Protocol, of particular interest for impact assessment studies, because most of the worlds biodiversity is located there. It appears that the potential impact or risk assessment discussion in DCs, if it is actually carried out, is based on scientific assumptions and clearly balances risks and benefits. It is also clear that the information needed to predict the impact in a particular case is not, and probably will not be, available. General strategies for risk and benefit assessment have been discussed in several workshops and meetings in DCs and clearly show that the potential benefits outweigh the potential ecological risks.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	1997-04
Authors:	de Kathen, Andre
Publisher:	Biostrategy Associates
Subject:	Agriculture \| biotechnology \| biosafety \| developing countries \| transgenic crops \| field release \| impact assessment \| research \| Microbiology

More details

Type of publication:	Journal
Language:	English
Notes:	Andow, D.A., (1994). Community response to transgenic plant release: using mathematical theory to predict effects of transgenic plants. Molecular Ecology, 3: 65-70.; Crawley, M.J., (1992). The comparative ecology of transgenic and conventional crops. In: Casper, R., and Landsmann, J. (eds.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on The Biosafety Results of Field Tests of Genetically Modified and Organisms, Goslar-Braunschweig: Biologische Bundesanstalt fur Land- und Forstwirtschaft.; De Block, M., Herrera-Estrella, L., van Montagu, M., Schell, J. and Zambryski, P. 1984, EMBO Journal, 3: 1681-1689.; De Kathen, A,. (1996). The impact of transgenic crop releases on biodiversity in developing countries. Biotechnology and Development Monitor, No. 28: 10-14. ; Frederick RJ, Virgin I, Lindarte E (1995) Environmental concerns with transgenic plants in centers of diversity: potato as a model. Stockholm, The Biotechnology Advisory Commission of the Stockholm Environmental Institute and the Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture.; Horsch, R.B., Fraley, R.T., Rogers, S.G., Sanders, P.R., LLoyd, A. and Hoffman, N., 1984. Science, 223, 496-498.; Hugenholtz, P. and Pace, N.R., (1996). Identifying microbial diversity in the natural environment: a molecular phylogenetic approach. TIBTECH, 14: 190-198.; James, C. and Krattiger, A.,F., (1996). Global Review of the field testing and commercialization of transgenic plants: 1986-1995 -The first decade of crop biotechnology. ISAAA-Briefs No. 1. ; Miller, H. I., (1996). Biotechnology and the UN: New challenges, new failures. Nature Biotechnology 14: 831-834. ; OECD, (1993). Traditional crop breeding practices: a historical review to serve as a baseline for assessing the role of modern biotechnology. OECD, Paris.; Raybould, A.F. and Gray, A.J., (1994). Will hybrids of genetically modified crops invade natural communities? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9/3: 85-89.; Sawahel, W.A., (1994). Transgenic plants: performance, release and containment. World J. of Microbiol. & Biotechnol., 10: 139-144.; Torgersen, H., (1996). Ecological impacts of traditional crop plants - a basis for the assessment of transgenic plants. Umweltbundesamt Osterreich, ISBN 3-85457-283-2. ; Virgin, I., Frederick R.J., (1996) Biosafety Capacity Building: Evaluation Criteria Development. Stockholm, The Biotechnology Advisory Commission of the Stockholm Environment Institute.
Source:	BASE

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009455351