Can contracts solve the hold-up problem? Experimental evidence
In the contract-theoretic literature, there is a vital debate about whether contracts can mitigate the hold-up problem, in particular when renegotiation cannot be prevented. Ultimately, this question has to be answered empirically. As a first step, we have conducted a laboratory experiment with 960 participants. We consider investments that directly benefit the non-investing party. While according to standard theory, contracting would be useless if renegotiation cannot be ruled out, we find that option contracts significantly improve investment incentives compared to a no-contract treatment. This finding might be attributed to Hart and Moore's (2008) recent idea that contracts can serve as reference points.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hoppe, Eva I. ; Schmitz, Patrick W. |
Published in: |
Games and Economic Behavior. - Elsevier, ISSN 0899-8256. - Vol. 73.2011, 1, p. 186-199
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Hold-up problem Option contracts Renegotiation Experiment |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Hoppe, Eva I., (2012)
-
Contracting under Incomplete Information and Social Preferences: An Experimental Study
Hoppe, Eva I., (2013)
-
Public-Private Partnerships versus Traditional Procurement: An Experimental Investigation
Hoppe, Eva I., (2011)
- More ...