Comparative Risk Sensitivity with Reference-Dependent Preferences.
Experimental evidence suggests that individuals are risk averse over gains and risk seeking over losses (i.e., they have S-shaped utility functions in an expected utility setting) and that they are loss averse. Furthermore, the evidence leads to a single definition of S-shaped utility, but it has led to several alternative specifications of loss aversion. This paper characterizes the relations "more S-shaped than" and "more loss averse than" for a utility function, and in so doing arrives at a new definition of loss aversion based on average instead of marginal utility. Copyright 2002 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Neilson, William S |
Published in: |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. - Springer. - Vol. 24.2002, 2, p. 131-42
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The 1985-86 Oil Price Collapse and Afterwards: What Does Game Theory Add?
Griffin, James M, (1994)
-
A Further Examination of Cumulative Prospect Theory Parameterizations.
Neilson, William S, (2002)
-
Reference Wealth Effects in Sequential Choice.
Neilson, William S, (1998)
- More ...