Comparing clinical data with administrative data for producing acute myocardial infarction report cards
We compared measures of hospital performance by using both administrative and clinical data sources. Hospital-specific mortality outcomes on 10086 patients who had been admitted to 102 hospitals with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in Ontario, Canada, were used as a test-case. Four and six hospitals were identified as having mortality that was statistically significantly higher than expected by using administrative and clinical data respectively, when model-based indirect standardization was used. When using random-effects models, zero and two hospitals were identified as having significantly higher mortality by using administrative and clinical data respectively. Approximately one in four hospitals changed at least two decile rankings when clinical data were used compared with when administrative data were used. Copyright 2005 Royal Statistical Society.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Austin, Peter C. ; Tu, Jack V. |
Published in: |
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A. - Royal Statistical Society - RSS, ISSN 0964-1998. - Vol. 169.2006, 1, p. 115-126
|
Publisher: |
Royal Statistical Society - RSS |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Bayesian modeling of missing data in clinical research
Austin, Peter C., (2005)
-
Bayesian extensions of the Tobit model for analyzing measures of health status
Austin, Peter C., (2002)
-
A comparison of Bayesian methods for profiling hospital performance
Austin, Peter C., (2002)
- More ...