Controlling Non-Controlling Shareholders : The Case of Effective Control

One of the most important developments underlying capital markets in recent years is the increase in the influence of activist minority shareholders. In a company without a controlling shareholder, dominant and active shareholders, who hold a low proportion of the company's shares, can influence, and even tip the scales in the decisions made and direct the company's business. As a result, the legal system imposes a fiduciary duty not only on controlling shareholders but also on those with effective control, but alongside the obligation, the absence of a clear and explicit definition of the concepts of effective power and effective control stands out. The article empirically analyzes key court decisions litigated under Delaware law and finds that only two explanatory variables significantly explain court decisions in cases raising the question of effective control. Therefore, the article proposes a test for estimating the effective power borrowed from the field of cooperative game theory. The test is based on the Shapley Value and the Shapley and Shubik's Power Index and presents its application to the decisions made at the shareholders' meetings to estimate the effective power of activist minority shareholders in various decisions. As detailed in the article, this test, simple to operate, examined objectively based on the factual system that existed at the time of making the tested decision and is not limited to specific ownership structures, certain markets, and current times. The adoption of the test is expected to increase the legal certainty regarding the imposition of duties on activist minority shareholders with effective control, thereby reducing the agency costs created as a result of the gap between their formal share in the corporation and their effective power