Corrigendum to: Structural Reforms and Labor Productivity Growth in Developing Countries: Intra or Inter-Reallocation Channel?

In the originally published version of this manuscript, there were three mistakes, which are listed in this corrigendum as follows:The following statement was unintentionally omitted from the “Notes” section. “We would like to thank the Editor, Professor Nina Pavcnik, and anonymous reviewers for useful and constructive comments and suggestions. We are grateful to Neil Foster-McGregor for his excellent comments and guidance. We would also like to thank Jo van Biesebroeck, Marcel Fafchamps, Gaaitzen de Vries and Gideon Ndubuisi for their comments and suggestions. Our thanks also go to the participants at the CSAE conference, March 2019, Oxford; UNU-WIDER conference on transforming economies, September 2019, Bangkok, and the participants at the internal seminar at Campinas University, August 2019, São Paulo.”In the section “Intrasectoral or Intersectoral Reallocation Channel?,” the sentence “Table 6 decomposes the contribution of the effect of reforms on the growth rate of labor productivity that comes through the within component and through the between component Among trade reforms current account reform is the one that has the highest effect on labor productivity growth arising through the within component.” should read: “Table 6 decomposes the contribution of the effect of reforms on the growth rate of labor productivity that comes through the within component and through the between component. Among trade reforms current account reform is the one that has the highest effect on labor productivity growth arising through the within component.”There was a typo in the notation of Equation 2.These mistakes have been corrected online.https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhac002