CREATIVE CLASS OR PROCREATIVE CLASS: IMPLICATIONS FOR LOCAL ECONoMIC DEVELOPMENT POLICY

Using a national database this project evaluates the relative merits of the creative and procreative classes in supporting sustainable economic health in cities over time. The analysis suggests that attempts at attracting the creative class through development of cultural and entertainment amenities appear misguided. The creative class, at least as currently defined in the popular and academic literatures, does not seem to be a reliable driver of economic growth. Further, the record of local economic development incentives appears similarly weak. Financial incentives in particular do not appear to lead to economic growth and actually seem to make local economies worse. What does appear to lead to economic growth? The answer, based on the data here, seems to be investments in policies and activities that make the community a better place to live, and a better place for families (of any type or form) in particular—good local schools, safe streets, parks, libraries, public buildings and spaces.