• GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
  • PREFACE
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • PŘEHLED
  • MAIN REPORT
  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • 1.1. Objectives
  • 1.2. Background and Context
  • 1.3. Evaluation Questions
  • 1.4. Limitations affecting the evaluation
  • 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
  • 2.1 Overall performance was good
  • 2.2 Programmes were relevant but design was uneven
  • 2.3 Transfer of inputs into outputs was mostly efficient
  • 2.4 Intended results in the main achieved
  • 2.5 Positive immediate impact and intermediate impacts, but limited socio-economic impact
  • 2.6 Institutional reforms mostly sustainable
  • 3. THEMATIC/ CROSSCUTTING FINDINGS
  • 3.1 Phare improved the performance of the Czech Republic’s pre-accession process
  • 3.2 Successful but mixed contribution to improved administrative and judicial capacity
  • 3.3 Phare ESC was clearly beneficial but limited in scope
  • 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
  • 4.1 Conclusions
  • 4.2 Recommendations and lessons learned
  • ANNEXES
  • Annex 1. Terms of Reference
  • Annex 2. Phare National and CBC Programme Data for Czech Republic 1999-2001
  • Annex 3. Evaluation Planning Summary Sheet
  • Annex 4. Evaluation Indicators
  • Annex 5. Sample projects – Financial data and results
  • Annex 6. Summary responses from questionnaires
  • Annex 7. List of Documents
  • Annex 8. List of Interviews
  • Annex 9. Respondents to Questionnaires