Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Intellectual Property.
We investigate how liability rules and property rules protect intellectual property. Infringement might not be deterred under any of the enforcement regimes available. However, counter-intuitively, a credible threat of infringement can actually benefit the patentholder. We compare the two doctrines of damages, lost profit (lost royalty) and unjust enrichment, and argue that unjust enrichment protects the patentholder better than lost royalty in the case of proprietary research tools. Both can be superior to a property rule, depending on how much delay is permitted before infringement is enjoined. For other proprietary products (end-user products, cost-reducing innovations), these conclusions can be reversed. Copyright 2001 by the RAND Corporation.
Year of publication: |
2001
|
---|---|
Authors: | Schankerman, Mark ; Scotchmer, Suzanne |
Published in: |
RAND Journal of Economics. - The RAND Corporation, ISSN 0741-6261. - Vol. 32.2001, 1, p. 199-220
|
Publisher: |
The RAND Corporation |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Damages and Injunctions in Protecting Proprietary Research Tools
Schankerman, Mark, (2000)
-
Damages and injunctions in protecting proprietary research tools
Schankerman, Mark, (2000)
-
Still Looking for Lost Profits: The Case of Horizontal Competition
Schankerman, Mark, (2005)
- More ...