Debt Capacity and Tests of Capital Structure Theories
We examine the impact of explicitly incorporating a measure of debt capacity in recent tests of competing theories of capital structure. Our main results are that if external funds are required, in the absence of debt capacity concerns, debt appears to be preferred to equity. Concerns over debt capacity largely explain the use of new external equity financing by publicly traded firms. Finally, we present evidence that reconciles the frequent equity issues by small, high-growth firms with the pecking order. After accounting for debt capacity, the pecking order theory appears to give a good description of financing behavior for a large sample of firms examined over an extended time period.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Lemmon, Michael L. ; Zender, Jaime F. |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 45.2010, 05, p. 1161-1187
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Do Incentives Matter? Managerial Contracts for Dual-Purpose Funds
Lemmon, Michael L., (2000)
-
Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital Structure
LEMMON, MICHAEL L., (2008)
-
Do incentives matter? : Managerial contracts for dual-purpose funds
Lemmon, Michael L., (2000)
- More ...