Deciding to Distrust
We employ experiments to illustrate one factor contributing to the lack of distrust in the recent corporate scandals: Trust rather than no trust was the default. Holding the expected returns from trusting constant, people are more trusting when the default is trust than when it is no trust. In a new game, the Distrust Game (DTG), where the default is full trust, trust levels are higher and trustworthiness levels lower than in the BDM-Trust Game (TG), where the default is no trust. Agents punish distrust more in the DTG than in the TG but principals do not anticipate this.
Year of publication: |
2005-08
|
---|---|
Authors: | Bohnet, Iris ; Meier, Stephan |
Institutions: | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Trust and the Reference Points for Trustworthiness in Gulf and Western Countries
Herrmann, Benedikt, (2009)
-
The Elasticity of Trust: How to Promote Trust in the Arab Middle East and the United States
Bohnet, Iris, (2010)
-
When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint Versus Separate Evaluation
Geen, Alexandra Vivien Van, (2012)
- More ...