Describing engineering documents with faceted approaches: Observations and reflections
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to highlight the difficulty of applying faceted classification outside of library contexts and also to indicate that faceted approaches are poorly expressed to non-experts. Design/methodology/approach - The faceted approach is being applied outside of its "home" community, with mixed results. The approach is based in part on examination of a broad base of literature and in part on results and reflections on a case study applying faceted notions to "real world" engineering documentation. Findings - The paper comes across a number of pragmatic and theoretical issues namely: differing interpretations of the facet notion: confusion between faceted analysis and faceted classification: lack of methodological guidance; the use of simplistic domains as exemplars: description verses analysis: facet recognition is unproblematic; and is the process purely top-down or bottom-up. Research limitations/implications - That facet analysis is not inherently associated with a particular epistemology; that greater guidance about the derivation is needed, that greater realism is needed when teaching faceted approaches. Practical implications - Experiences of applying faceted classifications are presented that can be drawn upon to guide future work in the area. Originality/value - No previous work has reflected oil the actual empirical experience used to create a faceted description, especially with reference to engineering documents.
|Year of publication:||
|Authors:||Wild, P J ; Giess, Matthew ; McMahon, Christopher A|
|Type of publication:||Article|
Saved in bookmark lists
Similar items by subject
Find similar items by using search terms and synonyms from our Thesaurus for Economics (STW).