Did Population Well-being Improve During Porfirian Mexico? A Regional Analysis using a Quasi-Human Development Index
It is argued that economic growth during the Porfiriato did not improve the well-being of the Mexican population. One explanation for such result is that the economic growth pattern was skewed and benefited more the northern states and less the southern ones. Following the estimation method of the Human Development Index, we calculate a Quasi-Human Development Index for the Mexican states during the period 1895--1910. Results show that at the start of the period (1895) the northern states were already the most developed. During the next 15 years this pattern was maintained and the dispersion in human development increased marginally. Finally, it is shown that the true losers of the Porfiriato were the states surrounding Mexico City and not the southern ones.
Year of publication: |
2012
|
---|---|
Authors: | Campos-Vázquez, Raymundo M. ; Vélez-Grajales, Roberto |
Published in: |
Journal of Human Development and Capabilities. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1945-2829. - Vol. 13.2012, 4, p. 597-620
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Campos-Vázquez, Raymundo M., (2010)
-
Declining Wages for College-Educated Workers in Mexico : Are Younger or Older Cohorts Hurt the Most?
Campos-Vázquez, Raymundo M., (2016)
-
Layers of inequality: Unequal opportunities and skin colour in Mexico
Monroy-Gómez-Franco, Luis, (2021)
- More ...