Difficulties in Making Implicit Government Risk-Bearing Partnerships Explicit.

This article explains how lobbying pressure intensifies tax-transfer inefficiencies in disaster prevention and relief. The social-welfare tradeoff in the government's joint provision of safety regulation and disaster relief is distorted by disinformational lobbying activity by disaster-exposed households and by conflict between principles of horizontal and vertical equity. Horizontal equity presupposes that no group of taxpayers wants to transfer wealth ex ante to equally wealthy disaster-exposed parties. But vertical equity implies that, when disaster strikes, households that were previously able to hide the mitigability of their exposure to a ratable hazard can nevertheless extract sizable transfers from other taxpayers ex post. Copyright 1996 by Kluwer Academic Publishers