Do Forecasting Methods Reduce Avoidable Error? Evidence from Forecasting Competitions
The set of M-competitions Ð comparing the forecasting accuracy of two dozen common time series methods Ð is a landmark in our understanding of how different methods fare on a variety of data types. For example, one common procedure, the trend line extrapolation available in Excel, emerged as the least accurate of all, and probably should be considered a must to avoid. Yet, as Steve Morlidge tells us here, the implications for practitioners, especially demand forecasters, are not widely understood and quite possibly overlooked by most. Steve not only summarizes the key implications, he also uses a selection of data from the M3-Competition Ð the most recent (year 2000) and most comprehensive Ð to shed additional light on the bounds of forecastability: the best (and worst) forecast accuracy we can expect to achieve. Copyright International Institute of Forecasters, 2014
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Morlidge, Steve |
Published in: |
Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting. - International Institute of Forecasters - IIF. - 2014, 32, p. 34-39
|
Publisher: |
International Institute of Forecasters - IIF |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
"Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"?
Morlidge, Steve, (2017)
-
Future ready : how to master business forecasting
Morlidge, Steve, (2010)
-
Viability as a basis for performance measurement
Hoverstadt, Patrick, (2007)
- More ...