Do nothing, do minimum or do something? : why public project appraisals "always" recommend large projects
Year of publication: |
2024
|
---|---|
Authors: | Volden, Gro Holst ; Welde, Morten ; Engebø, Atle ; Andersen, Bjørn Sørskot |
Published in: |
International journal of managing projects in business. - Bingley : Emerald, ISSN 1753-8386, ZDB-ID 2423896-X. - Vol. 17.2024, 3, p. 430-454
|
Subject: | Baseline | Cost-benefit analysis | Do-minimum | Do-nothing | Do-something | Government investment projects | Initiation phase | Optimism bias | Public project appraisal | Reference alternative | Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse | Theorie | Theory | Projektmanagement | Project management | Projektbewertung | Project evaluation | Öffentliche Investition | Public investment | Öffentliche Güter | Public goods |
-
Government's credit-rating concerns and the evaluation of public projects
Levy, Nadav, (2014)
-
On risk deductions in public project appraisal
Anderson, Jock R., (1983)
-
Contradictory outcomes of cost-benefit analyses : findings from Norwegian public-investment projects
Bardal, Kjersti Granås, (2020)
- More ...
-
Public project success? : measuring the nuances of success through ex post evaluation
Volden, Gro Holst, (2022)
-
A collaborative project delivery method for design of a high-performance building
Engebø, Atle, (2020)
-
Ethical challenges during construction project handovers
Lohne, Jardar, (2020)
- More ...