DOES FISCAL POLICY MATTER? BLINDER AND SOLOW REVISITED
This paper uses the old Keynesian representative agent model developed by Roger E. A. Farmer [<italic>Expectations, Employment and Prices</italic>. New York: Oxford University Press (2010)] to answer two questions: (1) Do increased government purchases crowd out private consumption? (2) Do increased government purchases reduce unemployment? Farmer compared permanent tax-financed expenditure paths and showed that the answer to (1) was yes and the answer to (2) was no. We generalize his result to temporary bond-financed paths of government purchases that are similar to the actual path that occurred during WWII. We find that a temporary increase in government purchases does crowd out private consumption expenditure as in Farmer. However, in contrast to Farmer's experiment, we find that a temporary increase in government purchases can also reduce unemployment.
Year of publication: |
2012
|
---|---|
Authors: | Farmer, Roger E. A. ; Plotnikov, Dmitry |
Published in: |
Macroeconomic Dynamics. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 16.2012, S1, p. 149-166
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Does Fiscal Policy Matter? Blinder and Solow Revisited
Farmer, Roger E. A., (2010)
-
DOES FISCAL POLICY MATTER? BLINDER AND SOLOW REVISITED
Farmer, Roger E. A., (2011)
-
Does Fiscal Policy Matter? Blinder and Solow Revisited
Farmer, Roger E. A., (2010)
- More ...