Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors
In primary and secondary education, measures of teacher quality are often based on contemporaneous student performance on standardized achievement tests. In the postsecondary environment, scores on student evaluations of professors are typically used to measure teaching quality. We possess unique data that allow us to measure relative student performance in mandatory follow-on classes. We compare metrics that capture these three different notions of instructional quality and present evidence that professors who excel at promoting contemporaneous student achievement teach in ways that improve their student evaluations but harm the follow-on achievement of their students in more advanced classes. (c) 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved..
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Carrell, Scott E. ; West, James E. |
Published in: |
Journal of Political Economy. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 118.2010, 3, p. 409-432
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Impact of Intergroup Contact on Racial Attitudes and Revealed Preferences
Carrell, Scott E., (2015)
-
Does drinking impair college performance? Evidence from a regression discontinuity approach
Carrell, Scott E., (2011)
-
Carrell, Scott E., (2011)
- More ...