DOES WORKSHARING WORK? SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE IAB-ESTABLISHMENT PANEL
Recent policy debate in Europe suggests that a shorter workweek will lead to more jobs (worksharing). We derive and estimate a model where the firm employs two types of workers, some working overtime, the rest standard hours. Worksharing is not always a prediction of the theory. Using German establishment-level panel data (the IAB-ESTABLISHMENT panel), 1993-1999, we find no evidence of pro-worksharing effects except in small plants in the East German non-service sector. There is evidence that a cut in standard hours lowers the proportion of overtime workers in a plant, as predicted by the theory, and increases the proportion of standard-time plants. Copyright (c) Scottish Economic Society 2005.
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Andrews, M. J. ; Schank, T. ; Simmons, R. |
Published in: |
Scottish Journal of Political Economy. - Scottish Economic Society - SES. - Vol. 52.2005, 2, p. 141-176
|
Publisher: |
Scottish Economic Society - SES |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Does worksharing work? : Some empirical evidence from the IAB panel
Andrews, Martyn J., (2004)
-
Does worksharing work? : Some empirical evidence from the IAB-establishment panel
Andrews, Martyn J., (2005)
-
High wage workers and low wage firms: negative assortative matching or limited mobility bias?
Andrews, M. J., (2008)
- More ...