Doubly misspecified models
Estimation bias arising from local model uncertainty and incomplete data has been studied by Copas & Eguchi (2005) under the assumption of a correctly specified marginal model. We extend the approach to allow additional local uncertainty in the assumed marginal model, arguing that this is almost unavoidable for nonlinear problems. We present a general bias analysis and sensitivity procedure for such doubly misspecified models and illustrate the breadth of application through three examples: logistic regression with a missing confounder, measurement error for binary responses and survival analysis with frailty. We show that a double-the-variance rule is not conservative under double misspecification. The ideas are brought together in a meta-analysis of studies of rehabilitation rates for juvenile offenders. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2012
|
---|---|
Authors: | Lin, N. X. ; Shi, J. Q. ; Henderson, R. |
Published in: |
Biometrika. - Biometrika Trust, ISSN 0006-3444. - Vol. 99.2012, 2, p. 285-298
|
Publisher: |
Biometrika Trust |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Penalized Gaussian Process Regression and Classification for High-Dimensional Nonlinear Data
Yi, G., (2011)
-
Gaussian Process Functional Regression Modeling for Batch Data
Shi, J. Q., (2007)
-
The Interactions of Organizational and Competitive Influences on Strategy and Performance
Henderson, R., (1997)
- More ...