Efficient Selection of Insured Currency Positions: Protective Puts vs. Fiduciary Calls
We examine the empirical results from implementation of portfolio insurance strategies employing currency spot and futures options. Hypotheses are generated from Ogden and Tucker's (1988) generalizations concerning the relative values of American spot currency options and currency futures options. We find that protective puts using futures options are generally dominated by both protective puts that use options on spot currencies and by fiduciary calls on futures contracts. This suggests that the prices of puts on foreign currency futures contracts are too high, relative to foreign currency futures calls and to puts on spot currencies.
Year of publication: |
1995
|
---|---|
Authors: | Conover, James A. ; Dubofsky, David A. |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 30.1995, 02, p. 295-312
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Efficient Selection of Insured Currency Positions: Protective Puts vs. Fiduciary Calls
Conover, James A., (1995)
-
Efficient selection of insured currency positions : protective puts vs. fiduciary calls
Conover, James A., (1995)
-
Does it Pay to Forecast the Business Cycle? A U.S. Update and an International Perspective
Conover, James A., (2017)
- More ...