Equalization and Stabilization
The federal Equalization transfer program makes fiscal resources of "have-not" provinces depend on fiscal conditions in "have" provinces, which tends to destabilize provincial finances: the data show that equalized revenues of receiving provinces are more volatile than own-source revenues. But this reflects the revenue risks facing the aggregate of all provinces, which an equalization program cannot insure. Controlling for aggregate risk, I find that the program has a significant stabilizing effect on provincial finances. Nevertheless, some improvements in revenue-sharing through the program might be contemplated. For example, a return to a national average capacity standard, from the five-province standard which has been in place since 1982, would increase insurance for idiosyncratic shocks by about one-third.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Smart, Michael |
Published in: |
Canadian Public Policy. - University of Toronto Press. - Vol. 30.2004, 2, p. 195-208
|
Publisher: |
University of Toronto Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Taxation and deadweight loss in a system of intergovernmental transfers
Smart, Michael, (1998)
-
A simple proof of the efficiency of the poll tax
Smart, Michael, (1999)
-
How do recent tax reforms affect the behaviour and welfare of families?
Smart, Michael, (2001)
- More ...