• TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • PREFACE
  • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
  • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • MAIN REPORT
  • 1. SECTORAL BACKGROUND AND SCOPE OF EVALUATION
  • 1.1. SECTORAL BACKGROUND
  • 1.2. SCOPE OF EVALUATION
  • 2. EVALUATION RESULTS
  • 2.1. ALTHOUGH RELEVANT TO AGREED POLITICAL OBJECTIVES, ASSISTANCE OFTEN LACKED SUFFICIENT NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE AND POLITICAL SUPPORT TO ENSURE PROGRAMME OBJECTIVES ARE ACHIEVED
  • 2.2. ADAPTING PROJECTS TO THE PACE OF POLITICAL CHANGE HAS ENSURED THAT MOST RESULTS WERE ACHIEVED DESPITE LOWER THAN EXPECTED COMMITMENT TO CHANGE IN A NUMBER OF AREAS
  • 2.3 ASSISTANCE IS EFFECTIVE, BUT LIMITED NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY AND A CHALLENGING POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT THREATEN THE ACHIEVEMENT OF SOME OBJECTIVES
  • 2.4 REAL IMPACT IN MANY AREAS OF INSTITUTION BUILDING IS LIMITED BY THE ONGOING POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND COMPLEX CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY
  • 2.5 SOME KEY INSTITUTIONS HAVE BEEN HANDED OVER ON A SUSTAINABLE BASIS TO THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES BUT MOST, ESPECIALLY AT STATE LEVEL, REMAIN WEAK AND VULNERABLE
  • 2.6 A NUMBER OF SECTORAL AND CROSS-SECTORAL ISSUES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED
  • 3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 3.1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 3.2 PERFORMANCE RATING (SEE ANNEX 3 FOR RATINGS OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS)
  • 3.3 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TABLE
  • ANNEXES
  • ANNEX 1. SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION – PROGRAMME DETAILS
  • ANNEX 2. INDICATORS OF ACHIEVEMENT
  • ANNEX 3. PERFORMANCE RATING BY PROJECT AND CLUSTER
  • ANNEX 4. LIST OF INTERVIEWS
  • ANNEX 5. LIST OF DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THE EVALUATION
  • ANNEX 6. COST EFFECTIVENESS