• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  • 1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION AND METHODOLOGY
  • 1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
  • 1.2 EVLUATION METHODOLOGY
  • 2. EVALUATION CONTEXT
  • 2.1 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION-UN PARTNERSHIP
  • 2.2 THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
  • 2.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
  • 3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
  • 3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON GUIDING CRITERIA
  • 3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SPECIFIC EXPERTISE
  • 3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS AND IMPACT
  • 3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON STRENGTHENING THE UN SYSTEM
  • 3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON SCALING UP
  • 3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY
  • 3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON IMPLEMENTATION &COST REDUCTION
  • 3.8 EVALUATION QUESTION 8 ON LEGAL FRAMEWORK
  • 3.9 EVALUATION QUESTION 9 ON COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
  • 4. CONCLUSIONS
  • 4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
  • 4.2 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
  • 4.3 ADDED VALUE OF CHANNELLING FOR THE COMMISSION, FOR THE UN, FOR PARTNER COUNTRIES,AND AS CONVEYED BY THE COMMISSION
  • 4.4 RESULTS & IMPACT
  • 4.5 EFFICIENCY OF THE AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
  • 4.6 VISIBILITY
  • 4.7 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
  • 5. RECOMMENDATIONS
  • 5.1 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
  • 5.2 EFFICIENCY OF AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
  • 5.3 VISIBILITY
  • 5.4 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE