- Abbreviations and Acronyms
- Executive Summary
- 1 Introduction
- 1.1 The ERD initiative
- 1.2 Objectives of the evaluation
- 1.3 Methodological framework
- 1.3.1 Mapping of comparable initiatives
- 1.3.2 On-line surveys
- 1.3.3 Interviews
- 1.3.4 Document analysis
- 1.3.5 Analysis of citations and quotations
- 1.3.6 The evaluation timeframe
- 1.3.7 Limitations of the evaluation
- 1.4 Structure of this report
- 2 Findings
- 2.1 Introductory findings
- 2.1.1 Seniority of the ERD initiative
- 2.1.2 Perceived quality of reports
- 2.1.3 Reading habits of ERD users
- 2.1.4 Independence of ERD
- 2.1.5 The ERD events: facts and figures
- 2.2 Contribution to enhancing the research -policymaking dialogue
- 2.2.1 Researchers and policymakers at consultations events
- 2.2.2 How users assess ERD support to dialogue and policymaking
- 2.2.3 Most useful reports for policymaking
- 2.2.4 Contribution to policymaking: success stories
- 2.2.5 Policymakers and reports: an on-going reflection
- 2.3 ERD and stakeholders outside the EU development community
- 2.3.1 Consultations and stakeholders outside the EU development community
- 2.3.2 Geographic provenance of extra-EU stakeholders
- 2.3.3 Further elements of the dialogue with extra-EU communities
- 2.3.4 Fostering of the dialogue: main achievements
- 2.4 Enhancing awareness; Contribution to the debate
- 2.4.1 ERD as a visible process vs. ERD as an output
- 2.4.2 Institutional visibility of ERD
- 2.4.3 The topics of ERDs
- 2.4.4 ERD as a support to the work of EU Delegations
- 2.4.5 ERD as a source of reference
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011625000