- List of Tables
- List of Figures
- List of Abbreviations
- 1. SUMMARY
- 1.1. Summary of conclusions
- 1.2. Summary of Recommendations
- 2. INTRODUCTION
- 2.1. Description of the Network instrument
- 2.2. Purpose and scope of the evaluation
- 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 3.1. Research design
- 3.1.1. Construction of the intervention logic
- 3.1.2. Methods of data collection and analysis
- 3.2. Analysis of collected data
- 4. EVALUATION RESULTS
- 4.1. Functioning of the Network
- 4.1.1. Internal coherence of objectives
- 4.1.2. Current set-up of the Network
- 4.1.3. The website
- 4.1.4. Contact points and organisation at national level
- 4.1.5. The meetings of contact points and Network members
- 4.1.6. CIRCA
- 4.1.7. Requests for judicial co-operation and their registration
- 4.1.8. Analysis on functioning of the Network
- 4.1.9. Conclusions on Network functioning
- 4.2. Interaction of the Network members and components
- 4.2.1. Coordination amongst national contact points and / or national networks
- 4.2.2. Role of Network members as intermediary vis- à -vis to ultimate users
- 4.2.3. Interaction with experts who monitor legislative work in civil law
- 4.2.4. Analysis on interaction of the Network members and components
- 4.2.5. Conclusions on interaction of the Network members and components
- 4.3. Results and impacts of the Network
- 4.3.1. Facilitation of relations between courts
- 4.3.2. Impacts of the Network related to judicial cooperation
- 4.3.3. Impacts of the Network related to the principle of mutual recognition
- 4.3.4. Impacts of the Network related to preparedness for entry into force of new instruments
- 4.3.5. Analysis on results and impacts of the Network
- 4.3.6. Conclusions on results and impacts of the Network
- 4.4. Coherence of external instruments
- 4.4.1. Analysis on coherence of external instruments
- 4.4.2. Conclusions on coherence of external instruments
- 4.5. Access to justice of legal professions and the
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009637898