- 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- 1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation
- 1.2 Background of the Evaluation
- 1.3 Methodology
- 1.4 Analysis of the main findings for each Evaluation Question
- 1.5 Main Conclusions and Recommendations
- 2. INTRODUCTION
- 2.1 Synthesis of the Commission’s Strategy and Programmes
- 2.2 Context
- 2.3 Purpose of this Evaluation
- 3. METHODOLOGY
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Judgement Criteria & Indicators
- 3.3 Data & Information Collection
- 3.3.1 Thematic Studies
- 3.3.2 Media Coverage Analysis
- 3.3.3 E-Survey
- 3.3.4 Interviews with Brussels-based actors
- 3.3.5 Eurobarometer reports analysis
- 3.3.6 Case studies of specific events and partnerships
- 3.4 Methods of Analysis
- 3.5 Methods of Judgement
- 4. MAIN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
- 4.1 Findings from the Thematic Studies and the other Data Sources
- 4.1.1 Findings from the Thematic Studies
- 4.1.2 Case studies of specific events and partnerships
- 4.1.3 Findings from other sources
- 4.2 Answers to each Evaluation Question
- 4.2.1 EQ1: The image of EU external action
- 4.2.2 EQ2: Do the Visibility communication priorities achieve their objectives?
- 4.2.3 EQ3: A single, clearly defined Visibility strategy for EU external action?
- 4.2.4 EQ4: Perceptions of the benefits of EU external action
- 4.2.5 EQ5: Coordination between the EU institutions and with the EU Member States?
- 4.2.6 EQ 6: Coherence of message across external and internal policies?
- 4.2.7 EQ 7: Value added of the EU as a global actor in major international fora?
- 4.2.8 EQ8: Adequacy of EC resources to carry out the visibility strategy
- 4.2.9 EQ9: Stakeholder perceptions of results relative to the costs
- 4.2.10 EQ10: Translating visibility strategies into action plans
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011799380