Fee versus royalty licensing in spatial Cournot competition
This article investigates the optimal licensing mechanism in a spatial model where competitors set quantities and one firm owns a cost-reducing innovation. We show that when the firms spatially discriminate, the innovator gets higher profits by licensing through royalties instead than through a fixed fee, whereas in the case of uniform delivered quantities, the innovator prefers licensing by royalties (fixed fee) if and only if it has not (has) a sufficiently strong locational disadvantage with respect to the potential licensee. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Colombo, Stefano |
Published in: |
The Annals of Regional Science. - Western Regional Science Association - WRSA. - Vol. 52.2014, 3, p. 859-879
|
Publisher: |
Western Regional Science Association - WRSA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Collusion in two models of spatial competition with quantity-setting firms
Colombo, Stefano, (2012)
-
On the rationale of spatial discrimination with quantity-setting firms
Colombo, Stefano, (2011)
-
Discriminatory prices, predation and signal-jamming in a horizontal differentiation model
Colombo, Stefano, (2010)
- More ...