Feeling and Thinking in Memory-Based versus Stimulus-Based Choices
We contrast memory-based and stimulus-based choices, using dual-process theories such as Kahneman and Frederick's system 1/system 2 dichotomy. Systems 1 and 2 are conceptualized as distinct modes of thought, the former automatic and affective, the latter controlled and deliberate. Cognitive load impedes system 2, yielding greater reliance on system 1. In memory-based choice, consumers must maintain relevant options in working memory. Thus, memory-based choices are associated with greater cognitive load than stimulus-based choices. Indeed, we find that memory-based choices favor immediately compelling, affect-rich system 1 options, whereas stimulus-based choices favor affect-poor options whose attractiveness emerges from deliberative system 2 thought. (c) 2007 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Rottenstreich, Yuval ; Sood, Sanjay ; Brenner, Lyle |
Published in: |
Journal of Consumer Research. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 33.2007, 4, p. 461-469
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
On Decisions That Lead to Decisions: Direct and Derived Evaluations of Preference
Sood, Sanjay, (2004)
-
On the Psychology of Loss Aversion: Possession, Valence, and Reversals of the Endowment Effect
Brenner, Lyle, (2007)
-
On the Psychology of Loss Aversion: Possession, Valence, and Reversals of the Endowment Effect
Brenner, Lyle, (2007)
- More ...