Final evaluation of the Programme "Non State Actors and local Authorities" : Final Report: Volume 1 – Main Text

This report presents the final evaluation, commissioned by DEVCO/B2 and implemented between December 2012 and April 2013, of the Thematic Programme "Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development" (NSA- LA) 2007-2013. The sum of €1,571,075,501.66 was allocated in Annual Action Programmes (AAPs) for the period 2007-2013. The Programme is divided into 3 objectives. Objective 1 of the Programme is to promote an inclusive and empowered society in partner countries that will facilitate NSA and LA participation in poverty reduction and sustainable development strategies. Objective 2 is to promote awareness raising and development education in the EU and acceding countries about development issues. Objective 3 is to facilitate the coordination and communication of NSA and LA networks in EU and acceding countries.

MoreLess

Alternative title:	Final evaluation of the Programme "Non State Actors and local Authorities" : Final Report: Volume 2 – Annexes
Year of publication:	2013-12
Authors:	Novak, Adam ; Verdecchia, Stefano ; Economou, Elena
Institutions:	Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit - EuropeAid (contributor) ; IBF International Consulting (contributor) ; STEM (contributor)
Subject:	Armut \| poverty \| Bewertung \| evaluation \| Bewusstseinsbildung \| formation of consciousness \| Bildung \| education \| Entwicklungshilfe \| development aid \| EU \| Kooperation \| cooperation \| nachhaltige Entwicklung \| sustainable development \| Netzwerk \| network \| nichtstaatliche Organisation \| non-governmental organization \| Zivilgesellschaft \| civil society \| 2007 - 2012

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Scope and context
Methodology
Main conclusions
Main recommendations
2. CONTEXT OF THE EVALUATION
Objectives and scope of the evaluation
Methodology
3. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS:OBJECTIVE 1A AND 1B
EQ1: TO WHAT EXTENT IS IMPLEMENTATION CONSISTENT WITH PROGRAMMING?
...
EQ 2: TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE PROGRAMME INCORPORATED LESSONS LEARNED?
...
EQ3: TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME CORRESPOND TO THEEVOLVING POLICY PRIORITIES?
...
EQ4: WHAT IS THE MEASURABLE EFFECT OF THE PROGRAMME?
...
EQ5: HAS THE PROGRAMME REACHED AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND RANGE OF FINAL BENEFICIARIES?
...
EQ6: IS THE PROGRAMME WELL-INTEGRATED INTO THE BROADER SYSTEM OF COMMISSION,EUROPEAN AND PARTNER COUNTRY ODA POLICY?
...
EQ7: HOW SUSTAINABLE ARE THE RESULTS OF THE PROGRAMME?
...
EQ8: IN ADDITION TO ANY PROGRESS ON MEETING ITS OBJECTIVES, HAS THE PROGRAMME MADEANY OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTIONS TO COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMING (ATBOTH THE STRATEGIC AND IMPLEMENTATION LEVELS)?
...
EQ9: WHAT IS THE QUALITY OF MANAGEMENT OF THE PROGRAMME?
...
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS: OBJECTIVE 2
EQ1: TO WHAT EXTENT IS IMPLEMENTATION CONSISTENT WITH PROGRAMMING?
...
EQ2: TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE PROGRAMME INCORPORATED LESSONS LEARNED?
EQ4: WHAT IS THE MEASURABLE EFFECT OF THE PROGRAMME?
...
EQ5: HAS THE PROGRAMME REACHED AN APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND RANGE OF FINALBENEFICIARIES?
...
EQ6: IS THE PROGRAMME WELL-INTEGRATED INTO THE BROADER SYSTEM OF COMMISSION,EUROPEAN AND PARTNER COUNTRY ODA POLICY?
...

Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011799363