Free form property rights for fisheries: The decentralized design of rights-based management through groundfish "sectors" in New England
Harvest cooperatives were implemented in several US fisheries over the last decade during a period when US law prohibited implementation of any new individual fishery quota (IFQ) systems. Harvest cooperatives provided an alternative to individual quotas as a means to end the race for fish and increase fishery profitability. The prohibition on new IFQ systems in the US was lifted, but harvest cooperatives remain a more feasible and perhaps a superior alternative to IFQs for some fisheries. The New England Fishery Management Council is on the verge of implementing a new management system for the groundfish fishery based on harvest cooperatives known as "sectors". This paper describes the New England sector management system and discusses a number of advantages but also some drawbacks relative to IFQs. It argues that a hybrid of the two approaches could have advantages over either.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Holland, Daniel S. ; Wiersma, Joshua |
Published in: |
Marine Policy. - Elsevier, ISSN 0308-597X. - Vol. 34.2010, 5, p. 1076-1081
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Subject: | Fisheries Harvest cooperatives Individual quotas |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Holland, Daniel S., (2010)
-
Social capital and the success of harvest cooperatives in the New Endland groundfish fishery
Holland, Daniel S., (2013)
-
Social Capital and the Success of Harvest Cooperatives in the New England Groundfish Fishery
Holland, Daniel S, (2013)
- More ...