Full disclosure? The Open Method of Coordination, parliamentary debates and media coverage
This article answers the question of which EU-level characteristics of the Open Method of Coordination (OMC) are most likely to result in pressure on national governments to reconsider their policies as a result of OMC-related parliamentary activities and media coverage. On the basis of interviews with European Commission officials and an analysis of parliamentary debates in committee meetings and newspaper coverage on six OMCs in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands in the period 1996–2009, three characteristics are selected and their empirical relevance assessed. The findings indicate that, when an OMC is adopted in a policy field without any other type of EU-level activity already present, or does not include indicators/benchmarks or peer learning activities, the OMC will not increase the pressure on a national government.
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ruiter, Rik de |
Published in: |
European Union Politics. - Vol. 14.2013, 1, p. 95-114
|
Subject: | Democratic accountability | European Union | media coverage | national parliaments | open method of coordination |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
National Parliamentary Scrutiny Over EU Issues
Holzhacker, Ronald, (2002)
-
National Parliaments Before and After the Treaty of Lisbon. The Case of Romania
CORAVU, Alexandra, (2011)
-
Effectiveness of the European semester : explaining domestic consent and contestation
Maatsch, Aleksandra, (2017)
- More ...
Similar items by person