Getting Real about Uncertainty
Goodwin introduces his article with an incident in Italy when seven people (engineers, scientists, and a civil servant) were jailed following an earthquake in the city of L?Aquila in which 309 people died. At the trial it was alleged that they had failed in their duty by not properly assessing and communicating the risk that an earthquake in the area was imminent. Their mistake had been that they had simply conveyed the most likely outcome ? no earthquake ? rather than a probabilistic forecast that might have alerted people to the small chance of a strong earthquake. Goodwin points out, however, that incorporating uncertainty into forecasts is not straightforward. Probabilistic forecasts need to be presented so that they are credible, understandable, and useful to decision makers. Getting reliable estimates of uncertainty in the first place poses its own challenges, as he goes on to demonstrate. Copyright International Institute of Forecasters, 2014
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Goodwin, Paul |
Published in: |
Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting. - International Institute of Forecasters - IIF. - 2014, 33, p. 4-7
|
Publisher: |
International Institute of Forecasters - IIF |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Adjusting judgemental extrapolations using Theil's method and discounted weighted regression
Goodwin, Paul, (1997)
-
Common sense and hard decision analysis : why might they conflict?
Goodwin, Paul, (2009)
-
Should we be using significance tests in forecasting research?
Goodwin, Paul, (2007)
- More ...