Global trading versus linking: Architectures for international emissions trading
International emissions trading is widely seen as an indispensable policy pillar of climate change mitigation [Stern, N., 2007. The Economics of Climate Change. The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, New York]. This article analyzes five different types of trading architectures, classified into two top-down (UNFCCC driven) and three bottom-up (driven by individual countries or regions) approaches. The two types of approaches are characterized by a trade-off between environmental effectiveness and political feasibility, respectively, whereas their relative cost-effectiveness depends on implementation details. Bottom-up architectures constitute imperfect substitutes for top-down architectures in terms of environmental effectiveness, and thus remain mere fallback options. However, especially the 'formal linking' architecture can act as complement in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Flachsland, Christian ; Marschinski, Robert ; Edenhofer, Ottmar |
Published in: |
Energy Policy. - Elsevier, ISSN 0301-4215. - Vol. 37.2009, 5, p. 1637-1647
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Subject: | Emissions trading Climate policy Linking |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
To link or not to link: benefits and disadvantages of linking cap-and-trade systems
FLACHSLAND, CHRISTIAN, (2009)
-
Global trading versus linking: Architectures for international emissions trading
Flachsland, Christian, (2009)
-
Global trading versus linking: Architectures for international emissions trading
Flachsland, Christian, (2009)
- More ...