Governance Indicators: Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going?
Progress in measuring governance is assessed using a simple framework that distinguishes between indicators that measure formal rules and indicators that measure the practical application or outcomes of these rules. The analysis calls attention to the strengths and weaknesses of both types of indicators as well as the complementarities between them. It distinguishes between the views of experts and the results of surveys and assesses the merits of aggregate as opposed to individual governance indicators. Some simple principles are identified to guide the use and refinement of existing governance indicators and the development of future indicators. These include transparently disclosing and accounting for the margins of error in all indicators, drawing from a diversity of indicators and exploiting complementarities among them, submitting all indicators to rigorous public and academic scrutiny, and being realistic in expectations of future indicators. Copyright The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / <sc>the world bank</sc>. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kaufmann, Daniel ; Kraay, Aart |
Published in: |
World Bank Research Observer. - World Bank Group. - Vol. 23.2008, 1, p. 1-30
|
Publisher: |
World Bank Group |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Governance Matters VIII : Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2008
Kaufmann, Daniel, (2009)
-
Governance Matters VII : Aggregate And Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2007
Kaufmann, Daniel, (2008)
-
Governance Indicators : Where Are We, Where Should We Be Going ?
Kaufmann, Daniel, (2007)
- More ...