Governing risk, engaging publics and engendering trust: New horizons for law and social science?
Modern biosciences require governance frameworks capable of simultaneously managing risk, coping with uncertainty, combatting ambivalence, and building trust, while encouraging the delivery of those instrumental outputs that we value/demand. This multi-dimensional task makes the design and delivery of good governance frameworks extremely difficult. Efforts to date have, by and large, failed, particularly where the law has been relied on. Preoccupation with risk has tended to shape regulatory systems, but the conception of risk relied on is deficient, and its use is often oriented to support precautionary approaches in the absence of 'evidence'. Our collaborative efforts lead us to suggest that more robust mechanisms need to be deployed which reveal and promote interactions with a fuller gamut of risks. We argue for a reflexive mode of governance which addresses the dynamic nature of science and uses the law more effectively as a value- and institution-framing mechanism. Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Harmon, Shawn H. E. ; Laurie, Graeme ; Haddow, Gill |
Published in: |
Science and Public Policy. - Oxford University Press, ISSN 0302-3427. - Vol. 40.2013, 1, p. 25-33
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Patents, patients and consent : exploring the interface between regulation and innovation regimes
Laurie, Graeme, (2007)
-
Placing evidence in context: A response to Fry's commentary
Williams, Brian, (2008)
-
Promoting research participation: Why not advertise altruism?
Williams, Brian, (2008)
- More ...