Hard and soft paths for climate change adaptation
Amory Lovins' distinction between 'soft' and 'hard' paths of energy technologies is applied, <italic>mutatis mutandis</italic>, to humanity's efforts to adapt to climate change. It is argued that hard adaptive measures involve capital-intensive, large, complex, inflexible technology and infrastructure, whereas soft adaptive measures prioritize natural capital, community control, simplicity and appropriateness. The prevalence of these two types of adaptation pathways is illustrated through two case studies from the Maldives: The Safer Island Development Program and the Integrating Climate Change Risks Program. Policymakers must be aware that hard and soft adaptation measures may trade off with each other, and give both paths due consideration.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Sovacool, Benjamin K. |
Published in: |
Climate Policy. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1469-3062. - Vol. 11.2011, 4, p. 1177-1183
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The cultural barriers to renewable energy and energy efficiency in the United States
Sovacool, Benjamin K., (2009)
-
A grounded comparison of energy security in Denmark, Brazil, Bangladesh, and China
Sovacool, Benjamin K., (2012)
-
Sovacool, Benjamin K., (2011)
- More ...