Hits-and-misses for the evaluation and combination of forecasts
Error measures for the evaluation of forecasts are usually based on the size of the forecast errors. Common measures are, e.g. the mean squared error (MSE), the mean absolute deviation (MAD) or the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Alternative measures for the comparison of forecasts are turning points or hits-and-misses, where an indicator loss function is used to decide if a forecast is of high quality or not. Here, we discuss the latter to obtain reliable combined forecasts. We apply several combination techniques to a set of German macroeconomic data. Furthermore, we perform a small simulation study for the combination of two biased forecasts.
Year of publication: |
2001
|
---|---|
Authors: | Wenzel, Thomas |
Published in: |
Journal of Applied Statistics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0266-4763. - Vol. 28.2001, 6, p. 759-773
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Pitman-closeness as a measure to evaluate the quality of forecasts
Wenzel, Thomas, (1998)
-
An evaluation of forecasting methods and forecast combination methods in goods management systems
Schneider, Carsten, (1999)
-
Combination of biased forecasts: Bias correction or bias based weights?
Wenzel, Thomas, (1999)
- More ...