Hold-up and the inefficiency of job assignments
This paper examines the trade-off between job assignments and incentives for specific investments. Under an incomplete contract, employees tend to underinvest in firm-specific human capital. To defuse this hold-up problem, the employer chooses an inefficiently low promotion standard. This result provides an explanation of the Peter Principle. However, if human capital investments also have an impact on promotion, the optimal standard might be inefficiently high.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kiyotaki, Fumi |
Published in: |
Research in Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 1090-9443. - Vol. 64.2010, 1, p. 36-44
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Peter principle Hold-up problem Human capital investment |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The effects of a consolation match on the promotion tournament
Kiyotaki, Fumi, (2004)
-
Hold-up and the inefficiency of job assignments
Kiyotaki, Fumi, (2010)
-
Promotion tournaments with multiple tasks
Kiyotaki, Fumi, (2008)
- More ...