How Responsive are Quits to Benefits?
Economists have argued that one function of fringe benefits is to reduce turnover. However, the effect on quits of the marginal dollar of benefits relative to wages is underresearched. We use the benefit incidence data in the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth and the cost information in the National Compensation Survey to impute benefit costs and estimate quit regressions. The quit rate is much more responsive to benefits than to wages, and total turnover even more so; benefit costs are also correlated with training provision. We cannot disentangle the effects of individual benefits due to their high correlation.
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Frazis, Harley ; Loewenstein, Mark A. |
Published in: |
Journal of Human Resources. - University of Wisconsin Press. - Vol. 48.2013, 4
|
Publisher: |
University of Wisconsin Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Reexamining the Returns to Training: Functional Form, Magnitude, and Interpretation
Frazis, Harley, (2005)
-
Estimating linear regressions with mismeasured, possibly endogenous, binary explanatory variables
Frazis, Harley, (2003)
-
How Responsive are Quits to Benefits?
Frazis, Harley, (2009)
- More ...