How should the auditors be audited? Comparing the PCAOB Inspections with the AICPA Peer Reviews
In their investigation of the new PCAOB Inspections, Lennox and Pittman [Lennox, C., Pittman, J., 2009. Auditing the auditors: evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of the audit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, forthcoming] address one of the most important and controversial features of the recent shift from self-regulation to government regulation in the US audit markets. In this paper I attempt to place their investigations into the broader auditing and regulatory literature, critique what we learn and do not learn from their analysis, and make suggestions for future related research.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | DeFond, Mark L. |
Published in: |
Journal of Accounting and Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0165-4101. - Vol. 49.2010, 1-2, p. 104-108
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Auditors PCAOB Peer Reviews Regulation Sarbanes-Oxley |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Palmrose, Zoe-Vonna, (2018)
-
Earnings quality research : advances, challenges and future research
DeFond, Mark L., (2010)
-
How should the auditors be audited? : comparing the PCAOB inspections with the AICPA peer reviews
DeFond, Mark L., (2010)
- More ...