- Introduction
- 1.1 Aim and scope of the study
- 1.2 Stakeholders consulted
- 1.3 Final Report
- 1 Problem definition
- 2.1 Problem area 1: Costly and cumbersome visa application procedures
- 2.1.1 ...
- 2.3 Problem area 2: Suboptimal use of forms of consular cooperation
- 2.3.1 ...
- 2.4 Problem area 3: Lack of a visa allowing for longer stays during a given period
- 2.4.1 ...
- 3.1 The dimensions of the issues being considered
- 3.2 Key EU level policy developments
- 3.3 Key changes envisaged
- 3.3.1 ...
- 3.4 Rationale for intervening at EU level
- 3.4.1 ...
- 4 The policy objectives
- 5 The policy options
- 6 Assessment of the policy options
- 6.1 Approach to the assessment
- 6.2 Assessment of the individual policy options
- 6.2.1 ...
- 7 The preferred policy option
- Annexes
- Annex 1 Assessment of proposals
- ...
- Annex 2 Notes on Impact assessment study supporting the review of the Union's visa policy to facilitate legitimate travelling
- A2.1 Introduction
- A2.2 Economic Impacts
- A2.3 Cost model
- A2.4 Revenue model
- A2.5 Problem area 1: Lengthy, cumbersome and costly procedures – Proposals: Introducing harmonised MEV
- A2.6 Problem area 2: Insufficient consular presence in handling and processing visa applications – Proposals: Improving consular cooperation
- A2.7 Problem area 3: Lack of visa or other authorisation allowing travellers to stay more than 90 days in any 180-day period in the Schengen area - Proposals: Introduction of a new type of authorisation
- Annex 3 Detailed explanatory note
- A3.1 Background information and visa applicants affected by proposals being considered (Spreadsheet 1 Visa applications affected)
- ...
- A3.2 Background and information to assess the effects of MEV facilitation proposals...
- A3.3 Financial impacts
- A3.3.1 ...
- Costs and revenues
- A3.3.3 ...
- A3.4 Economic impacts
- Annex 4 List of stakeholders interviewed
- Annex 5 Consultation of interested parties
- Annex 6 Statistics
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528084