In or out? – the CFTC explains when virtual currencies come within its jurisdiction
Purpose: To summarize and explain the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC’s) guidance regarding whether cryptocurrency is subject to CFTC jurisdiction. Design/methodology/approach: The article reviews the CFTC’s March 24, 2020 final interpretive guidance, summarizes the history of the agency’s jurisdiction over leveraged, margined or financed retail transactions, and relates it to the CFTC’s guidance and judicial decisions regarding cryptocurrency. Findings: We found that the CFTC, in carrying out its leadership role related to developments in the fintech industry, had provided clarity about its jurisdiction over cryptocurrency. The CFTC defines virtual currency as a “commodity,” even if intangible, and finds that many transactions in virtual currency satisfy the exception to the CFTC’s jurisdiction over leveraged retail commodity transactions because “delivery” can be said to occur within 28 days. Originality/value: The article provides a useful summary of an important pronouncement from the CFTC in a manner that is readily understandable and relatable to industry participants and legal practitioners in this field.
Year of publication: |
2020
|
---|---|
Authors: | Nathan, Daniel ; Mathews, Nikiforos |
Published in: |
Journal of Investment Compliance. - Emerald, ISSN 1528-5812, ZDB-ID 2048718-6. - Vol. 21.2020, 2/3 (23.11.), p. 167-169
|
Publisher: |
Emerald |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Decomposing the Israeli term structure of interests rates
Nathan, Daniel, (2021)
-
Smart contracts that violate the Commodity Exchange Act: which parties are liable?
Mathews, Nikiforos, (2019)
-
Structured finance hedge criteria compared
Croke, James J., (2008)
- More ...