INCENTIVE CONTRACTS UNDER IMPERFECT AUDITING
In this paper we analyze the optimal incentive contracts under imperfect auditing. Both principal's commitment and no commitment to auditing cases are investigated. In the commitment case, the Baron-Besanko-type (RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 15 (1984), pp. 447-470) contract would fail under imperfect auditing. In the no-commitment case, the Baron-Myerson (Econometrica, Vol. 50 (1982), pp. 911-930) and the Khalil-type (RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 28 (1997), pp. 629-640) contracts could survive under specific misjudging probabilities. In addition, there exists a separate equilibrium with the agent's full compliance and the principal's sure ex post auditing. Copyright © 2008 The Authors.
Year of publication: |
2008
|
---|---|
Authors: | CHEN, HSIAO-CHI ; LIU, SHI-MIIN |
Published in: |
Manchester School. - School of Economics, ISSN 1463-6786. - Vol. 76.2008, 2, p. 131-159
|
Publisher: |
School of Economics |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Commitment or no-commitment to monitoring in emission tax systems?
Chen, Hsiao-Chi, (2013)
-
Tradeable-permit pollution control systems with and without commitment to auditing
Chen, Hsiao-Chi, (2005)
-
An emission tax pollution control system with imperfect monitoring
Chen, Hsiao-Chi, (2009)
- More ...